tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7615135.post113650380993619618..comments2023-08-26T10:34:53.715-05:00Comments on Escape the Okie Zone: Happy New YearGarvaldhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18439316429769913477noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7615135.post-1141507458802723382006-03-04T15:24:00.000-06:002006-03-04T15:24:00.000-06:00DARTH: SHOW YOURSELF AND FIGHT LIKE A MAN! i WUDDA...DARTH: SHOW YOURSELF AND FIGHT LIKE A MAN! i WUDDA GONE TO iRAQ BUT iM TOO OLD. i CAN FIGHT TERRORISM WITH MY CARTOONS. THEY ARE ALMOST AS FUNNY AS THE ONES ON WWW.NEWSBUSTERS.ORG! <BR/>DARTH: IM A LIBERTARIAN. i BELIEVE IN FREEDOM OF SPEECH BUT CALLING BUSH A LIAR IS WRONG! COME ON YOU HACKS! <BR/>DARTH: I DEMAND AN APOLOGY! <BR/>Darthster: wheres my Scotch?? <BR/>Darthster: "Hey you are all hacks" as I swallow my sorrows defeated again on this site wondering about my own resignation from Karl's payroll! <BR/>Darthster: "Hey you are all hacks" as I swallow my sorrows defeated on this site wondering about my own resignation from Karl's payroll! <BR/>Darthster: "Hey you are all hack" as I swallow my sorrows defeated on this site wondering about my own resignation from Karl's payroll! <BR/>Darthster: the distinction between a company owned by a foreign government and one simply based in a foreign country is critical as a matter of law. Indeed, critics argue that, in approving the deal, the administration ignored a federal law governing the transfer of American assets to foreign, government-owned companies. <BR/>Darthster: Faced with widespread criticism in recent weeks, the Bush administration and several of its supporters have promoted numerous false and misleading claims intended to downplay approval of the DPW transaction and cast their critics as racist, politically opportunistic, or both <BR/>Darthster: Many cited what some major media outlets have described as the UAE's "mixed" record on terrorism and further claimed that the administration flouted federal law by failing to conduct a full review of the national security implications of the deal. <BR/>Darthster: [LINK] <BR/>Darthster: [LINK] <BR/>Darthster: You are all bigots, comin from darth in one breath and then fat jewish girls the next breath! tdf then he takes umbrage to being called a redneck native american! tdf <BR/>Darthster: sound familiar- amzing where darth gets his info- hotline to Karl??? DOD Lets investigate. enquiring minds wanna know!! <BR/>Darthster: a company owned by the government of Dubai, a member state of the United Arab Emirates (UAE) -- and cast critics of the transaction as racist, politically opportunistic, or both. The media, in turn, have often repeated these claims without challenge or correction. <BR/>Im a bush lover!: Top ports deal myths and falsehoods Summary: Faced with widespread criticism in recent weeks, the Bush administration and some of its supporters have promoted numerous false and misleading claims intended to downplay the approval of a deal that would turn over control of terminal operations at six U.S. ports to Dubai Ports World (DPW) -- <BR/>Im a bush lover!: who have long stressed the administration's failings on port security -- are merely using the sale for political purposes, media coverage of the ports sale has been deeply flawed. <BR/>Im a bush lover!: From repeatedly downplaying the taking over company as merely foreign-based rather than actually owned by a foreign government -- one with a mixed record on terror at best -- to wildly misleading comparisons of Dubai Ports World to the British company from which it is purchasing the terminals to mindless repetition of the Bush administration's false spin that it conducted a thorough review of the transaction to false suggestions that Democrats -- <BR/>Im a bush lover!: The Bush administration's decision to hand control of terminals in six major U.S. ports over to a company owned by the government of the United Arab Emirates, without conducting the review that many contend is required by law, has been met with massive public disapproval -- and an unending stream of conservative misinformation in the media. <BR/>Im a bush lover!: Will they warn Republicans that they better cave to Democrats on the issue whenever it comes up lest they risk reminding voters that Osama bin Laden is still out there, that the United Arab Emirates is still scheduled to take control of our ports, and that Iraq is on the brink of civil war? <BR/>Im a bush lover!: Will our newspapers and airwaves now be dominated by dire warnings from journalists and pundits to the White House and congressional Republicans? People don't like Bush's approach to terrorism; will Chris Matthews and Tim Russert and Brit Hume and Wolf Blitzer and Jeff Greenfield now talk about how much of a political liability to Bush this issue is? <BR/>Im a bush lover!: the medias liberal! <BR/>Im a bush lover!: Every time Bush dispatched Karl Rove to deflect attention from his own failures by threatening to bludgeon liberals and Democrats with Bush's terrorism credentials, the media ate it up. Now that polls show that the American people don't approve of Bush's handling of terrorism, one question presents itself: Will the media be consistent? <BR/>Im a bush lover!: Every time Bush dispatched Karl Rove to deflect attention from his own failures by threatening to bludgeon liberals and Democrats with Bush's terrorism credentials, the media ate it up. Now that polls show that the American people don't approve of Bush's handling of terrorism, one question presents itself: Will the media be consistent? <BR/>Im a bush lover!: Hey we're about to get Bin Laden! well get him right before the elections! and liberlas think we steal elections! <BR/>More -->Garvaldhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18439316429769913477noreply@blogger.com