IF UUU DON'T LIKE IT HERE, U CAN F@#KIN LEAVE!

Well, I start off with a title and now I gotta write somethin with purposely poor English so Ill appeal to grammatically incorrect blokes that vote for ADD presidents that love to say Nucular (nuclear) or ideal instead of idea. How many people in this state know the difference between and Ideal and an idea?

So , Im havin this great convesation with a triathlete who Im gonna teach how to swim when I was rudely interrupted by 2 Bubbas suffering from being brainwashed by Rush (the Oxycontin drug rep on the radio) for 20 years angry that I should have this site and told me, "why the fuck dont u leave, If u dont like it?"
Im trying to and that why Im writing about this process of leaving this state of Bubba love! But I told them to look on the website and leave a comment instead of comin by my place and
"openin up another can of Whoopass!" (sound familiar? tag team wrestling at lumpomania!)
But dont republican rednecks believe in Democracy?
This state suffers the first step in the 12 step program:
1. ADMITTING THAT YOU SUFFER FROM REPUBLICANISM AND ENLARGEMENT OF THE STICK UP THEIR ASS..

uh oh! Harry said he'd get the Southside Mafia after me as handed me a bullet.
"WE'LL RESERVE ONE OF THESE FOR YOU!"

sometimes, even though Im a fan of Michael Moore, Im almost glad my tenant and neighbor have guns .....
"Wild, Wild, West" in Bubbaland!

Comments

  1. I like Harry and I dont want Harry to get angry but it concerned me that he seemed serious when he handed me the bullet?
    There are a lot of good qualities to this state but what Im wanting to get across is dont take urselves so seriously and to just to keep an open mind!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Well, now Im scared so I wonder about gettin a beer at Mike's or Bumpys but Schwarz is there and might tackle me and do another slam dunk for correcting him on his grammar!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hey dumbass.

    After reading this horse shit, it seams that you have pioneered the art of self importence by creating a site where you can post to yourself. Does this satisfy some longing to go to a therapist but you can't afford it, or is this a way to comunicate to your other personality.

    You say you were "rudely interupted", where as you sat down and interupted a conversation by spewing this liberal trash talk that is prominent throughout the left. So due to the fact that we didn't agree with your rantings, you post this derogatory bullshit to satisfy your own short commings. Pretty fucking sad

    ReplyDelete
  4. If you agree sending Americans into the desert to die for oil, then vote for Bush.
    If you like poor paying jobs that don't keep up with inflation, vote for Bush.
    If you believe health care is affordable and should stay this way, then vote for Bush.
    Just be a Bubba, wrap yourself in the flag, pretend he isn't creating huge deficits so he and his friends can get richer. That tax cut cost Americans $290 billion, the war in Iraq, not even $220 billion, yet. Bubba, Bush doesn't care about you at all unless you want to go die in the desert.

    ReplyDelete
  5. The thing I love about the left is the way they forget everything that was said prior to the present conversation. These are a few people that agreed with our going to war that you might remember.


    "One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to
    develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them.
    That is our bottom line."
    - President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

    "If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
    - President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

    "Iraq is a long way from [the USA], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."
    - Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998

    "He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
    - Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

    "We urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
    - Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens. Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others Oct. 9, 1998

    "Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
    - Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

    "Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass
    destruction and palaces for his cronies."
    - Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999

    "There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has invigorated his weapons
    programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies."
    - Letter to President Bush, Signed by Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL,) and others, December 5, 2001

    "We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a
    threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the
    mandated of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them."
    - Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

    "We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical
    weapons throughout his country."
    - Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

    "Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to
    deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
    - Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

    "We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
    - Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

    "The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are
    confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and
    biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to
    build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence
    reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
    - Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

    "I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority
    to use force-- if necessary-- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
    - Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002

    "There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
    - Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

    "He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do" Rep.
    - Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002

    "In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that
    Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological
    weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has
    also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members .. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
    - Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

    "We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
    - Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

    "Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal,
    murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a
    particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to
    miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his
    continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real ..."
    - Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003

    SO NOW THE DEMOCRATS SAY PRESIDENT BUSH LIED, THAT THERE NEVER WERE ANY WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION AND HE TOOK Us TO WAR FOR HIS OIL BUDDIES???

    ReplyDelete
  6. Heres your pussy presidential candidate that bounces back and forth on every issue to match his current agenda.



    Senator Kerry recently wrote a letter to President Bush complaining, “You and your campaign have initiated a widespread attack on my service in Vietnam, my decision to speak out to end that war,” and warning, “I will not sit back and allow my patriotism to be challenged.”

    In the absence of any evidence from Mr. Kerry of an attack from the Bush campaign, Mr. Kerry seems to have originated his own doctrine of “pre-emption.” How valid are his concerns?

    No one denies Mr. Kerry’s four bemedaled months in “Swiftboats” or his seven-months’ service as an electrical officer on board the USS Gridley, during its cruises back and forth to California, or even his months as an admiral’s aide in Brooklyn, before he was able get out of the Navy six months early to run for office.

    Taking a look at Mr. Kerry’s much-promoted Vietnam service, his military record was, indeed, remarkable in many ways. Last week, the former assistant secretary of defense and Fletcher School of Diplomacy professor, W. Scott Thompson, recalled a conversation with the late Admiral Elmo R. Zumwalt Jr. that clearly had a slightly different take on Mr. Kerry’s recollection of their discussions:

    “[T]he fabled and distinguished chief of naval operations,Admiral Elmo Zumwalt, told me — 30 years ago when he was still CNO —that during his own command of U.S. naval forces in Vietnam, just prior to his anointment as CNO, young Kerry had created great problems for him and the other top brass,by killing so many non-combatant civilians and going after other non-military targets.‘We had virtually to straitjacket him to keep him under control,’ the admiral said. ‘Bud’ Zumwalt got it right when he assessed Kerry as having large ambitions — but promised that his career in Vietnam would haunt him if he were ever on the national stage.” And this statement was made despite the fact Zumwalt had personally pinned a Silver Star on Mr. Kerry.

    Mr. Kerry was assigned to Swiftboat 44 on December 1, 1968. Within 24 hours, he had his first Purple Heart. Mr. Kerry accumulated three Purple Hearts in four months with not even a day of duty lost from wounds, according to his training officer. It’s a pity one cannot read his Purple Heart medical treatment reports which have been withheld from the public. The only person preventing their release is Mr. Kerry.

    By his own admission during those four months, Mr. Kerry continually kept ramming his Swiftboat onto an enemy-held shore on assorted occasions alone and with a few men, killing civilians and even a wounded enemy soldier. One can begin to appreciate Zumwalt’s problem with Mr. Kerry as commander of an unarmored craft dependent upon speed of maneuver to keep it and its crew from being shot to pieces.

    Mr. Kerry now refers to those civilian deaths as “accidents of war.”And within four days of his third Purple Heart, Mr. Kerry applied to take advantage of a technicality which allowed him to request immediate transfer to a stateside post.

    Once back in the States, Mr. Kerry joined “the struggle for our veterans,” as he called it last week in Atlanta, by joining a scruffy organization called the Vietnam Veterans Against the War. The VVAW’s executive director, Al Hubbard, supposedly a former Air Force captain wounded in Vietnam, quickly appointed Mr. Kerry to the executive committee.

    Mr. Kerry participated with the VVAW at agitprop rallies such as Valley Forge and the “Winter Soldier” guerrilla theater atrocity trials in Detroit, finally testifying in April 1971 before the Senate as an authority on the war crimes his fellow American servicemen had committed in Vietnam.

    Outside of his own “accidents of war,” there is no evidence that Mr. Kerry had then or has now the least idea what may or may not have been the realities of ground combat. However, he had no problem reeling off for the Senate a series of unproven, secondhand allegations that would have been perfectly at home at the Nuremberg trials indicting his fellow veterans.

    Mr. Kerry stated there were “war crimes committed in Southeast Asia...not isolated incidents but crimes committed on a day-today basis with the full awareness of officers at all levels of command. They relived the absolute horror of what this country, in a sense, made them do.” Then Mr. Kerry got specific:

    “They had personally raped, cut off ears, cut off heads, taped wires from portable telephones to human genitals and turned up the power, cut off limbs, blown up bodies, randomly shot at civilians, razed villages in fashion reminiscent of Genghis Khan, shot cattle and dogs for fun, poisoned food stocks, and generally ravaged the countryside of South Vietnam...we are more guilty than any other body of violations of those Geneva Conventions; in the use of free-fire zones, harassment interdiction fire, search-and-destroy missions, the bombings, the torture of prisoners, all accepted policy by many units in South Vietnam.”

    In other words, My Lai was just another day in the life of the Vietnam War.

    This wasn’t a one-time occasion. The VVAW had been peddling this line from the day Mr. Kerry joined them and had been publishing charges like this for the previous two years. Mr. Kerry repeated them on “Meet the Press” with Al Hubbard, who was found to be a total fraud and who never served in Vietnam, much less was wounded. However, Mr. Kerry has never renounced the charges he made.

    Recently, his fellow VVAW supporter, Jane Fonda, has tried to minimize a potentially damaging picture of him a few rows behind her at the three-day VVAW Valley Forge rally in September 1970. And many members of the press fell for the line that it was accidental or coincidental, including Fox’s Chris Wallace and ABC’s Tim Russert.

    However, there were only eight or nine speakers that day, including Donald Sutherland, Mark Lane, Bella Abzug, and Ms. Fonda. And far from being a casual audience member, Mr. Kerry, an executive committee member, not Ms. Fonda, was the lead speaker.

    Ms. Fonda had been funding VVAW events since before Mr. Kerry joined its executive committee. At Valley Forge, Ms. Fonda said: “My Lai was not an isolated incident but rather a way of life for many of our military.”

    Their appearance together in that picture may be a lot of things, but it was not a coincidence.

    Mr. Kerry has already confessed his complicity in killing civilians as “accidents of war.” However, he has offered a classic Nuremberg defense that this was not only a commonplace occurrence throughout the Vietnam War, but he was carrying out a policy “with the full awareness of officers at all levels of command.”

    His commander of naval operations in Vietnam, who specifically designed the mission that Mr. Kerry and the other Swiftboat commanders executed, Admiral Zumwalt, clearly disagreed. An examination of the truth behind this disagreement is not an attack on Mr. Kerry. It is a matter of vital historical interest.

    ReplyDelete
  7. If the most honorable Oklahoma "anonymous" at least be courageous enough like our President to give yourself a pseudonym like "harry"...Bkut Bushe is very brave they way he partied on Cocaine carousing with his favorite Tesacx Bubbas ...like some redneck frat party and then gets an honorable discharge??

    Wow, sure helps to have the Rich CONNETICUT BUSH

    Have u heard of "Conneticut Yankee" by Mark Twain?

    ReplyDelete
  8. Oh, by the way Harry, importence??
    What does that mean?
    Use spell check just like our Conneticut boy needs it in his speaches and hooked on phonics lessons!

    ReplyDelete
  9. Wow...Is this Harry?...If it is,im very impressed with ur knowledge! and u used great grammar!!
    Way to go! I guess there might be some intellectual Bubbas that might be even be openminded to progressive thinking and realize what an idiot Bush is!

    ReplyDelete
  10. Hey Dick Nose, can't you concentrate long to put your ramblings into one post or do you like to imagine that anyone actually reads this shit and post to yourself.
    The only thing that I have actually written is the first paragraph of each of my previous post, so any errors are of the original writers. It's the sad state of the teachers in the country that even the liberal press cant find a good sentence structure to copy. If the teachers would concentrate a bit more on teaching and a bit less on tenure, this would be a far better course of action. Kinda like "no children left behind" that Kerry wants to shit can. Fucking brillant!!!

    You know, after reading some of your bullshit in previous post, you must get slapped around allot in your life. Did you get shoved in lockers as a child or what. Kinda sad really.

    ReplyDelete
  11. My dearest Harry Penis noser:
    Thanks for givin me input on this website you give me inspiration to educate poor Bubboreamusses as your self...Im sorry that your you have to resort to violence anger and penis envy names...Im sorry...seek good therapy Harry!

    ReplyDelete
  12. Personally, I don't care much about either candidate's military record, so you could have skipped the clip and post. I'd prefer to discuss war profiteering, Haliburton, The Carlyle Group, or Dick Cheney's and Paul Wolfowitz' plan for global dominance.
    To my knowledge, John Kerry has never said he wouldn't have gone into Iraq, just not so hastily and not without the international support we need. I suppose you'd rather talk trash on his wife, or bring up the Clintons. Go ahead, I'd take a dick-sucking scandal over this administration's abuse of power anyday. Muffy.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Way to go Muffy!!...My little Lees Summit wonder! Put those Bubbas in their place! DEFENSE!

    ReplyDelete
  14. Oh my big nut job. I had to snap you back into this dimension. Don't you know tharz a war goin' on?

    ReplyDelete
  15. I think it's pretty small minded for anyone (either from the left or the right) to name call and stereotype. I see a lot of that in each of these postings. It's very easy to point fingers and say how because my opinion differs from yours that I'm wrong. To say that the country is going to hell if a republican is re-elected. I happen to believe the opposite. Instead of throwing out comments that elude to the war being about oil show me facts. Show me that this war is soley based in oil. You can't. Having that said don't call it that. I'm all for opposing positions if you can base your opinions and statements in fact. If you can't, keep them to yourself. I happen to be a republican and don't appreciate the broadstrokes that you are painting. All republicans aren't from the extreme right. I could very easily label all Democrats as being from the far left and use some very catchy phrases (much as you did) but I won't. I have facts that I have based each and every one of opinions on. Do you?

    ReplyDelete
  16. Wisely, most of my education on the subject doesn't come from the internet. I read TIME, I read the Kansas City Star, I've been reading Harpers for years, publications that are hard on any pol, exposing what THEY would rather we didn't know. I read the Kerry biography written by 3 Boston Globe reporters who've covered him for many years, it seemed fair and objective, I know enough about him. So, slap a flag sticker on your big truck, and drive around the world chasing fossil fuels. I'm voting for a president who isn't so oily. Muffy

    ReplyDelete
  17. Forgive before I edit one of the comments about nut jobs was not me but some poor misguided Bubba with nothing better to do and so he signs off with my name...sad

    ReplyDelete
  18. Military Career of GW Bush ...check out his brilliant career on the www.hereinreality.com site!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Please Lord, get my ass in gear so that I can focus on the future for our family!